The Ruling on Reinterpreting What Has Been Abrogated
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The questioner:
May Allah reward you, Your Eminence, father. The questioner says: If Hatib (may Allah be pleased with him) was interpreting his sending of the message to the disbelievers, does what came in the beginning of Surat al-Mumtahanah constitute an abrogation of his action, since it was revealed after his action? Is it permissible to reinterpret what has been abrogated?
The Shaykh:
This is all talk with no benefit, and this question has no basis. We have finished. Yes.
The presenter:
I ask Allah for you, Your Eminence, father. The questioner says.
The Shaykh:
And we explained, we explained this in the lesson. Yes.
May Allah reward you, Your Eminence, father. The questioner says: If Hatib (may Allah be pleased with him) was interpreting his sending of the message to the disbelievers, does what came in the beginning of Surat al-Mumtahanah constitute an abrogation of his action, since it was revealed after his action? Is it permissible to reinterpret what has been abrogated?
The Shaykh:
This is all talk with no benefit, and this question has no basis. We have finished. Yes.
The presenter:
I ask Allah for you, Your Eminence, father. The questioner says.
The Shaykh:
And we explained, we explained this in the lesson. Yes.
Source
قناة «العلامة الدكتور صالح الفوزان»، [1601- 4717] إذا كان أول سورة الممتحنة نسخ لفعل حاطب فهل يجوز تأول ما تم نسخه؟ - الشيخ صالح الفوزان — youtube.com
The Arabic text is a machine transcription of the audio recording.