Passing the Miqat and then entering Ihram from another location
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
Question:
It was said: The one who performed the act of taking revenge, and he was not one who had designated his intention for Hajj, then he said, "Allahu Akbar." When he went to the last meeting in the East, and he did not call for the meeting he had passed by first, does he owe anything?
Answer:
He owes a fidyah (ransom payment). Either he must return to the miqat he passed and enter ihram from there, or if he enters ihram from another place, he owes a fidyah because he left an obligatory act. It is not sufficient for him to go to al-Hal or at-Tan'īm; that is not enough.
It was said: The one who performed the act of taking revenge, and he was not one who had designated his intention for Hajj, then he said, "Allahu Akbar." When he went to the last meeting in the East, and he did not call for the meeting he had passed by first, does he owe anything?
Answer:
He owes a fidyah (ransom payment). Either he must return to the miqat he passed and enter ihram from there, or if he enters ihram from another place, he owes a fidyah because he left an obligatory act. It is not sufficient for him to go to al-Hal or at-Tan'īm; that is not enough.
Source
قناة «العلامة الدكتور صالح الفوزان»، 93 من 175 /شرح بلوغ المرام/الحج/فضله وبيان من فرض عليه/صالح الفوزان/الحديث/كبار العلماء — youtube.com (57:42)
The Arabic text is a machine transcription of the audio recording.