The ruling on entering the state of ihram for 'Umrah from Jeddah after passing the miqat
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
Question:
The group went on a trip to the south, then returned to Jeddah, passing by the miqat of al-Yalamlam. They had intended to perform 'Umrah, and after a day or two in Jeddah, they entered the state of ihram from there and entered Makkah for 'Umrah. Is there any ruling regarding this?
Answer:
Yes, it was obligatory for these people to enter the state of ihram from the southern miqat, which is al-Sa'diyyah, or from al-Ta'if if they came via the road to al-Ta'if. Their passing the miqat and entering the state of ihram from Jeddah is entering ihram below the miqat. Therefore, they owe a fidyah (ransom payment). Their 'Umrah is valid, but they owe a fidyah. Each person owes a fidyah, which he slaughters in Makkah and distributes to the poor of the Haram. Yes.
The group went on a trip to the south, then returned to Jeddah, passing by the miqat of al-Yalamlam. They had intended to perform 'Umrah, and after a day or two in Jeddah, they entered the state of ihram from there and entered Makkah for 'Umrah. Is there any ruling regarding this?
Answer:
Yes, it was obligatory for these people to enter the state of ihram from the southern miqat, which is al-Sa'diyyah, or from al-Ta'if if they came via the road to al-Ta'if. Their passing the miqat and entering the state of ihram from Jeddah is entering ihram below the miqat. Therefore, they owe a fidyah (ransom payment). Their 'Umrah is valid, but they owe a fidyah. Each person owes a fidyah, which he slaughters in Makkah and distributes to the poor of the Haram. Yes.
Source
قناة «العلامة الدكتور صالح الفوزان»، ما حكم جماعة ذهبوا للنزهة إلى الجنوب، ثم عادوا إلى جدة مارّين بميقات يلملم، وكانوا ناوين العمرة...؟ — youtube.com
The Arabic text is a machine transcription of the audio recording.