Is the implication of inclusion and the implication of commitment the same?

The questioner:
He asks: Are the implication of inclusion and the implication of necessitation the same?

The Shaykh:
No, what are the implication of inclusion and the implication of necessitation?

The questioner:
Regarding the implication of inclusion and the implication of necessitation.

The Shaykh:
His intention is the implication of commitment. What is the implication of commitment? For example, I will give you an example to clarify this, if Allah wills. For example, you bought a house. You bought the house. The house includes doors, and posts, and tools, and fixed tools that are not movable, that are fixed.
Everything in the house that is fixed and connected to it is an implication of correspondence. Yes, it is all an implication of correspondence. You bought the whole house with the things fixed in it. As for the movable things, they do not enter the house except under a condition.
Except under a condition. And as for some of the things in the house that are connected to it, some of the things in the house, this is an implication of inclusion. An implication of inclusion indicates its parts. An implication of inclusion indicates its parts, and it indicates the whole as an implication of correspondence. Good. The house has a drain on the outside, it has gutters. This is an implication of commitment. It follows the house because it is outside the house. Yes.