The ruling on repeating the prayer for one who relied on the statement of the owner of the house and it became clear that he was wrong

Question : If he is not one of the people of independent legal reasoning in a settled location, and he relied on the statement of the owner of the house, and it became clear that the statement of the owner of the house was wrong, does he repeat it?

Answer : The school of thought is that he repeats it, because it was previously established that he must rely on the statement of a trustworthy person with certainty. However, the correct view is that he does not repeat it, because this person relied on the report of a trustworthy person. He did what was obligatory upon him, and as we said a moment ago, whoever does what is obligatory upon him does not have to repeat it, and it is not possible to oblige him to perform the prayer twice.