The ruling on one who passes the miqat without entering the state of ihram
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
Question:
The questioner says: A man came for the purpose of 'Umrah, but did not enter the state of ihram at the miqat due to his ignorance. We instructed him to go out to al-Tan'īm and enter the state of ihram from there. Does he owe anything? May Allah reward you with good.
Answer:
Yes, he owes a fidyah (ransom payment) for passing the miqat. He slaughters a fidyah in Makkah and distributes it to the poor. If he cannot find what he can afford, he fasts for ten days, because he passed the miqat without entering the state of ihram while intending to perform 'Umrah, and he entered the state of ihram from a point before the miqat; he entered the state of ihram from a point before the miqat.
The questioner says: A man came for the purpose of 'Umrah, but did not enter the state of ihram at the miqat due to his ignorance. We instructed him to go out to al-Tan'īm and enter the state of ihram from there. Does he owe anything? May Allah reward you with good.
Answer:
Yes, he owes a fidyah (ransom payment) for passing the miqat. He slaughters a fidyah in Makkah and distributes it to the poor. If he cannot find what he can afford, he fasts for ten days, because he passed the miqat without entering the state of ihram while intending to perform 'Umrah, and he entered the state of ihram from a point before the miqat; he entered the state of ihram from a point before the miqat.
Source
قناة «العلامة الدكتور صالح الفوزان»، ما حكم من تجاوز الميقات دون إحرام جاهلًا؟ وهل يجزئه إحرامه من التنعيم؟ للشيخ صالح الفوزان — youtube.com
The Arabic text is a machine transcription of the audio recording.