Is it true that in Jabir's hadith, neither the price nor the item sold was taken possession of in the contract session?

Question:
In Jabir's hadith, there was no taking of possession in the contract session, neither of the price nor the item sold. Is that valid?

Answer:
Taking possession is required. The Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him) saw the camel and bought it, but he left it in the seller's hand based on the condition the seller set for him. There is no harm in that. This is a specific item, and the sale of a specific item does not require taking possession. The camel is a specific item. This requirement applies to the sale of a non-specific item, where taking possession is required.