Text copied Link copied

Al-Fatawa – home

﴿ فَاسْأَلُوا أَهْلَ الذِّكْرِ إِن كُنتُمْ لَا تَعْلَمُونَ ﴾

Scholar
Search mode

If one forbids what is lawful and intends to break an oath, is the expiation obligatory before the act or after it?

Machine translationRead the Arabic original
Question:
May Allah reward you, Your Eminence, father. The questioner says: If one forbids what is lawful and then intends to break an oath, is the expiation obligatory for him after committing the act or before it? He says: May Allah reward you. If one forbids what is lawful upon himself and intends to break an oath, is the expiation obligatory after committing the act or before it?

Answer:
Both are permissible. It is permissible to perform the expiation before breaking the oath, and it is permissible to delay it until after breaking the oath. All of this is reported from the Messenger (peace and blessings be upon him) in his saying, "By Allah, I will, if Allah wills,
If I take an oath to do something and later on I find something else better than the first one, then I do what is better and make expiation for my oath.لا أحلف على يمين فأرى خيرا منها إلا أتيت الذي هو خير وكفرت عن يميني
Sahih al-Bukhari 6621
" This indicates that the expiation is to be performed after breaking the oath. In another narration, he said, "Except that I expiate for my oath and do what is better." This indicates that the expiation is permissible before the dream, yes.
Source قناة «العلامة الدكتور صالح الفوزان»، [2217- 4717] من حرم حلالاً وأراد أن يكفر، هل تجب الكفارة قبل الفعل أم بعده؟ - الشيخ صالح الفوزان — youtube.com

The Arabic text is a machine transcription of the audio recording.

Flag this fatwa