One of the racers preceded the others alone and took the prize of his companion

Question:
The Shaykh was born, or the author, and if one of the Orientalists preceded alone, he secured his own prize and took the prize of his companion. Is it not the case that he paid now and took more than he paid, because he preceded one and preceded his companion, so that this would be on the ground?

Answer:
This is conditional. This statement is conditional on there being a third person with them who did not pay, a third person who did not race, who paid compensation but did not race. Yes. However, if the payment is from only the two racers, this is not permissible. But what was mentioned here, if there is a third person with them who paid a prize and did not race with them, did not enter with them in the race, they call him the muhallil.