Taking a fee for keeping deposits
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The questioner:
Naturally, taking a fee for deposits, especially if he is speaking about locks and strongboxes.
The Shaykh:
If he takes a fee, he becomes a paid custodian who is liable. By taking a fee for it, he becomes a hired custodian who keeps it, so if it is lost, he is liable for it. Yes.
The questioner:
We can express it.
The Shaykh:
It is permissible, as long as it does not become a deposit but rather a paid custodianship. Yes, we do not call it a deposit; it becomes a hire. Yes.
Naturally, taking a fee for deposits, especially if he is speaking about locks and strongboxes.
The Shaykh:
If he takes a fee, he becomes a paid custodian who is liable. By taking a fee for it, he becomes a hired custodian who keeps it, so if it is lost, he is liable for it. Yes.
The questioner:
We can express it.
The Shaykh:
It is permissible, as long as it does not become a deposit but rather a paid custodianship. Yes, we do not call it a deposit; it becomes a hire. Yes.
Source
قناة «العلامة الدكتور صالح الفوزان»، 28 من 89|شرح العدة في شرح العمدة|البيوع|باب السبق|صالح الفوزان|الفقه|كبار العلماء — youtube.com (1:04:34)
The Arabic text is a machine transcription of the audio recording.
