The liability of the killer for the blood money of quasi-intentional homicide
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
Question:
The case of the Shaykh, may Allah grant you success, is that the ruling on the 'aqilah regarding quasi-intentional homicide is that the killer does not bear any of it, not even a single share.
Answer:
Yes, indeed. The position of the majority of scholars is that the perpetrator does not bear any of it, ever. He is required to perform the expiation; the expiation is sufficient for him. He must free a slave, or if he cannot, fast for two consecutive months. The expiation is sufficient for him, and they assist him with money. Yes.
The case of the Shaykh, may Allah grant you success, is that the ruling on the 'aqilah regarding quasi-intentional homicide is that the killer does not bear any of it, not even a single share.
Answer:
Yes, indeed. The position of the majority of scholars is that the perpetrator does not bear any of it, ever. He is required to perform the expiation; the expiation is sufficient for him. He must free a slave, or if he cannot, fast for two consecutive months. The expiation is sufficient for him, and they assist him with money. Yes.
Source
قناة «العلامة الدكتور صالح الفوزان»، 76 من 89|شرح العدة في شرح العمدة|كتاب الديات|صالح الفوزان|الفقه|كبار العلماء — youtube.com (1:08:25)
The Arabic text is a machine transcription of the audio recording.