He said: “So-and-so’s slaughter is forbidden to me, just as his mother is forbidden to me.” Then he ate from the slaughter. Is it sufficient for him to expiate?
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
Question:
A man hosted another and said, “His slaughter is forbidden to me, just as his mother is forbidden to me.” However, the host slaughtered the animal and ate from it, then he performed the expiation for an oath. Is that sufficient for him?
Answer:
If he said, “Your slaughter is forbidden to me,” then the expiation for an oath is sufficient for him. But if he said, “If you slaughter, it is haram (forbidden) for me, like the prohibition of my mother,” this is zihar, and the expiation for zihar is required. Yes.
A man hosted another and said, “His slaughter is forbidden to me, just as his mother is forbidden to me.” However, the host slaughtered the animal and ate from it, then he performed the expiation for an oath. Is that sufficient for him?
Answer:
If he said, “Your slaughter is forbidden to me,” then the expiation for an oath is sufficient for him. But if he said, “If you slaughter, it is haram (forbidden) for me, like the prohibition of my mother,” this is zihar, and the expiation for zihar is required. Yes.
Source
قناة «العلامة الدكتور صالح الفوزان»، قال تُحرم عليَّ ذبيحة فلان كما حرمت أمه عليَّ ثم بعد ذلك أكل من الذبيحة، هل يجزئه أن يكفِّر؟ — youtube.com
The Arabic text is a machine transcription of the audio recording.