Is the intention to remove major ritual impurity sufficient in ablution?

Question : And what remains? The Islam of a disbeliever is a cause for connection, and there is disagreement on this. But according to the view that it is obligatory, what are the things that invalidate ablution? The minor is deceased. He says, "My father only bathes and we do not build a paper in the hadith of the minor."

Answer : No, the school of thought does not lift the impurity if he did not intend to remove the minor ritual impurity. If he did not intend both, the impurity was not lifted. This is the rule in reality, and I have something in my mind about it, because Allah the Exalted says: He said after that and He did not command washing the limbs, so Allah made obligatory in the state of major ritual impurity what? Only the bath. And for this reason, the stronger view, the stronger view as mentioned before, is that if the one in a state of major ritual impurity intends to remove the major ritual impurity, that is sufficient. He does not need to intend to remove both, because the removal did not obligate anything except what? Only to purify. It did not obligate us to wash the four limbs. And this is evidence that the cause of the state of major ritual impurity is what?
Only the bath. So, what did not obligate a bath did not obligate anything but the bath, unless consensus indicates otherwise. If so, consensus is followed. Otherwise, we say: No, what did not obligate a bath did not obligate anything but the bath, except by evidence. Now, but according to the author's statement, this is it.