What is the ruling on a woman who started menstruating after she had exited the state of ihram from 'Umrah?
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
Question:
He says: "I entered the state of ihram from the miqat, and on the way, I stopped. This woman says: I entered the state of ihram from the miqat, and on the way, my period started. Before the tawaf, I became pure, so I completed my 'Umrah and exited the state of ihram. After that, I saw the period again."
Answer:
If the blood stopped completely, and she saw nothing, and she performed the ghusl, performed the ghusl and wudu', and performed the tawaf, and no blood came down on her, then her tawaf is valid. This is purity that is intermittent, intermittent in the middle of the period; it does not contradict [the ruling]. The important thing is that she performs the entire tawaf while she is pure, and she has performed the ghusl and wudu'. The tawaf is valid. But if the blood did not stop and only decreased, its flow decreased, and it remained only a discharge, and she thought she was pure, but the blood did not stop completely, then her 'Umrah is not valid. It is obligatory for her, if the blood stops completely, that she is still in the state of ihram. So if the blood stops completely, she performs it again from the beginning, and the one that passed is not valid because she performed it while she was menstruating. Yes.
He says: "I entered the state of ihram from the miqat, and on the way, I stopped. This woman says: I entered the state of ihram from the miqat, and on the way, my period started. Before the tawaf, I became pure, so I completed my 'Umrah and exited the state of ihram. After that, I saw the period again."
Answer:
If the blood stopped completely, and she saw nothing, and she performed the ghusl, performed the ghusl and wudu', and performed the tawaf, and no blood came down on her, then her tawaf is valid. This is purity that is intermittent, intermittent in the middle of the period; it does not contradict [the ruling]. The important thing is that she performs the entire tawaf while she is pure, and she has performed the ghusl and wudu'. The tawaf is valid. But if the blood did not stop and only decreased, its flow decreased, and it remained only a discharge, and she thought she was pure, but the blood did not stop completely, then her 'Umrah is not valid. It is obligatory for her, if the blood stops completely, that she is still in the state of ihram. So if the blood stops completely, she performs it again from the beginning, and the one that passed is not valid because she performed it while she was menstruating. Yes.
Source
قناة «العلامة الدكتور صالح الفوزان»، ما حكم امرأة حاضت بعد أن تحللت من العمرة؟ للشيخ الفوزان — youtube.com
The Arabic text is a machine transcription of the audio recording.
