What is the difference between compromising with the disbelievers and accommodating them?
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
Question:
May Allah do you good, Your Eminence, father. The questioner asks: Is there a difference between compromising with the disbelievers and accommodating the disbelievers?
Answer:
Accommodating the disbelievers is permissible in cases of dire necessity, provided there is no concession of anything. Rather, one agrees with them in appearance regarding something that does not touch one's religion in reality. As for compromising, it is conceding the religion or part of it for the sake of the disbelievers. This is not permissible. Compromising is not permissible, and if states were to compromise, they would compromise, but it is not permissible. Compromising is conceding something from the religion to please the disbelievers. Yes.
May Allah do you good, Your Eminence, father. The questioner asks: Is there a difference between compromising with the disbelievers and accommodating the disbelievers?
Answer:
Accommodating the disbelievers is permissible in cases of dire necessity, provided there is no concession of anything. Rather, one agrees with them in appearance regarding something that does not touch one's religion in reality. As for compromising, it is conceding the religion or part of it for the sake of the disbelievers. This is not permissible. Compromising is not permissible, and if states were to compromise, they would compromise, but it is not permissible. Compromising is conceding something from the religion to please the disbelievers. Yes.
Source
قناة «العلامة الدكتور صالح الفوزان»، [2301- 4717] ما الفرق بين مداهنة الكفار ومداراتهم؟ - الشيخ صالح الفوزان — youtube.com
The Arabic text is a machine transcription of the audio recording.
