What is the ruling on one who passes the miqat without entering the state of ihram while intending to perform Hajj?

Question:
In his first question, he says: I traveled to Egypt and returned from there to the Noble Sanctuary of Makkah in the month of Dhul-Qa'dah, and I did not enter Makkah in the state of ihram, because I was intending to perform Hajj, and I had performed Hajj previously, praise be to Allah. Is there anything required of me after that?

Answer:
The Hajj is valid, and praise be to Allah, if you performed it in the required manner and completed its rites. However, your entry into Makkah by passing the miqat without ihram while you intended to perform Hajj means that you have left an obligatory act of Hajj. This is because one who passes the miqat while intending to perform Hajj or 'Umrah is required to enter the state of ihram from the miqat he passed, and he must not delay the ihram until Makkah or to a place before the miqat. Therefore, what happened to you is considered leaving an obligatory act, which requires you to pay a fidyah (ransom payment), which is slaughtering a sheep in Makkah and distributing it to the poor of the Haram. Yes.