The reason why one is not liable for slaughtering another person's sacrificial animal without permission
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The questioner : Yes. It is printed. Yes.
The Shaykh : If it is not authorized, then it is hoped for. Yes. For example, I did not authorize him to own what he owns.
The questioner : It is true that you did not authorize him, but slaughtering this specific sheep as a sacrifice is authorized by the Shari'ah.
The Shaykh : But he is not its owner. That is correct. For this reason, we said that if someone were to claim that he is liable for it as compensation for his transgression and the like, that would have a valid basis.
The Shaykh : If it is not authorized, then it is hoped for. Yes. For example, I did not authorize him to own what he owns.
The questioner : It is true that you did not authorize him, but slaughtering this specific sheep as a sacrifice is authorized by the Shari'ah.
The Shaykh : But he is not its owner. That is correct. For this reason, we said that if someone were to claim that he is liable for it as compensation for his transgression and the like, that would have a valid basis.
Source
قناة «فضيلة الشيخ محمد بن صالح العثيمين»، [3822] وجه عدم ضمان من ذبح هدي غيره من غير إذن - تعليقات على الكافي لابن عثيمين — youtube.com
The Arabic text is a machine transcription of the audio recording.