Evidence that disagreement on secondary issues does not invalidate the imamate?
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The questioner : Certainly, O Shaykh, that consumption in wars does not bring peace.
The Shaykh : What?
The questioner : Evidence that disagreement on secondary issues does not invalidate the success, meaning this man is an imam.
The Shaykh : Evidence that disagreement on secondary issues does not invalidate the imamate.
The questioner : The imamate of a man who is an imam and ate camel meat.
The Shaykh : Yes.
The questioner : And you have clear evidence that camel meat is taken from the prayer. Yes. So how do we permit the young one?
The Shaykh : This is something on which people are almost in consensus. Because by the consensus of the Muslims, some Muslims pray behind others even though they differ on secondary issues.
The Shaykh : What?
The questioner : Evidence that disagreement on secondary issues does not invalidate the success, meaning this man is an imam.
The Shaykh : Evidence that disagreement on secondary issues does not invalidate the imamate.
The questioner : The imamate of a man who is an imam and ate camel meat.
The Shaykh : Yes.
The questioner : And you have clear evidence that camel meat is taken from the prayer. Yes. So how do we permit the young one?
The Shaykh : This is something on which people are almost in consensus. Because by the consensus of the Muslims, some Muslims pray behind others even though they differ on secondary issues.
Source
قناة «فضيلة الشيخ محمد بن صالح العثيمين»، 3159دليل أن الاختلاف في الفروع لا يمنع صحة الإمامة؟📔 الشرح الممتع على زاد المستقنع - ابن عثيمين — youtube.com
The Arabic text is a machine transcription of the audio recording.