Text copied Link copied

Al-Fatawa – home

﴿ فَاسْأَلُوا أَهْلَ الذِّكْرِ إِن كُنتُمْ لَا تَعْلَمُونَ ﴾

Scholar
Search mode

What is the ruling on one who enters the state of ihram from the miqat but does not remove his clothes and does not wear the clothes of ihram?

Machine translationRead the Arabic original
Question:
May Allah reward you. The Honorable Shaykh says in the last question: I entered the state of ihram from the miqat, but I did not take off my clothes, and I did not wear the clothes of ihram. Some scholars told me that I owe a fidyah (ransom payment) for wearing sewn garments, and another fidyah for covering the head. Is this correct?

Answer:
Yes, this is correct. There is a fidyah for covering the head, because this is a prohibited act and is distinct, and a fidyah for wearing sewn garments because it is another prohibited act. So you owe two fidyahs. In each fidyah, you have the choice of three things: either fasting for three days, or feeding, or slaughtering a sheep in Makkah and distributing it to the poor of the Haram. Two fidyahs: one for covering the head and the other for wearing sewn garments. In each one, you have the choice among the three things. And Allah the Exalted knows best, and may Allah send prayers and peace upon our Prophet Muhammad and upon his family and his Companions.
Source قناة «العلامة الدكتور صالح الفوزان»، ما حكم من أحرم من الميقات ولكن دون أن ينزع ملابسه ولم يلبس ملابس الإحرام؟ لمعالي الشيخ صالح الفوزان — youtube.com

The Arabic text is a machine transcription of the audio recording.

Flag this fatwa