Retaliation in the severing of a deceased person's hand

Question:
The issue of Shaykh Muhammad ibn Nasir: If the sanctity of a person’s hand when he is dead is like its sanctity when he is alive, why does not the one who permitted it limit himself to cutting the hand of the dead after it has been lost?

Answer:
The sanctity of a Muslim, or breaking the bone of a Muslim when he is dead, is like breaking it when he is alive. This refers to the sanctity and the sin, not to the guarantee of compensation, not to the guarantee of compensation. The evidence for this is that the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) did not make retaliation obligatory for breaking the bones of the dead; rather, he only forbade this act and did not make retaliation obligatory for it. This is due to the lack of similarity; there is no similarity between a living person and a dead person, and retaliation means similarity.