Text copied Link copied

Al-Fatawa – home

﴿ فَاسْأَلُوا أَهْلَ الذِّكْرِ إِن كُنتُمْ لَا تَعْلَمُونَ ﴾

Scholar
Search mode

Combining the hadith that the cupper’s earnings are bad with the hadith of giving him a dinar

Machine translationRead the Arabic original
Question:
The questioner asks: How do we reconcile the hadith in which the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him)
He bled himself and gave the cupper a dinar, and the hadith that the cupper’s earnings are bad?احتجم وأعطى الحجام دينارا، وحديث كسب الحجام خبيث؟


Answer:
Yes. The cupper’s earnings are lawful; they are not forbidden, they are lawful. This is because the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him) gave him [the dinar]. However, it is disliked. So when he said it is “bad” (khabith), it does not mean it is forbidden; it means it is disliked. It is like what he (peace and blessings be upon him) said about onions, that they are a “bad” (khabith) tree, meaning they have a bad smell, not that they are forbidden. Onions are not forbidden, even though the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him) described them as “bad” (khabith), meaning bad-smelling.
As in His saying (Exalted and Majestic is He)
And do not aim toward the defective therefrom, spendingوَلَا تَيَمَّمُوا الْخَبِيثَ مِنْهُ تُنفِقُونَ
[Al-Baqarah 2:267]
The intended meaning is “bad” (raddi), meaning bad food, not that it is forbidden. So “bad” (khabith) may be used to mean “bad” (raddi), i.e., lawful but bad. This includes the cupper’s earnings.
Source قناة «العلامة الدكتور صالح الفوزان»، كيف نجمع بين الحديث الذي فيه أن رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم احتجم وأعطى الحجام دينارًا وحديث... — youtube.com

The Arabic text is a machine transcription of the audio recording.

Flag this fatwa