The Ruling on Citing Scholarly Disagreement in Issues
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
Question:
He also says that it is permissible to cite scholarly disagreement to justify matters of immorality, Islamic theatrical performances, and independent legal reasoning.
Answer:
This is the work of the people of desires; they cite disagreement to support what they want. These are the people of desires. It is obligatory to act in accordance with what the evidence establishes. Whoever does not know the evidence should refrain from speaking without knowledge.
The presenter:
May Allah reward you.
He also says that it is permissible to cite scholarly disagreement to justify matters of immorality, Islamic theatrical performances, and independent legal reasoning.
Answer:
This is the work of the people of desires; they cite disagreement to support what they want. These are the people of desires. It is obligatory to act in accordance with what the evidence establishes. Whoever does not know the evidence should refrain from speaking without knowledge.
The presenter:
May Allah reward you.
Source
قناة «العلامة الدكتور صالح الفوزان»، 04 من 15 / شرح أصول الإيمان / حتى إذا فزع عن قلوبهم/ صالح الفوزان / العقيدة/ كبار العلماء — youtube.com (1:10:39)
The Arabic text is a machine transcription of the audio recording.