The ruling on arguing with scholarly disagreement in the presence of an explicit text
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
Question:
May Allah reward you. The questioner asks: Do we argue with scholarly disagreement in the presence of an explicit text?
Answer:
This is misguidance. The explicit text takes precedence over the opinion of so-and-so, and knowing this is misguidance. If you know the explicit text, you hold fast to it, even if the one who said it contradicts it.
The presenter:
May Allah reward you.
May Allah reward you. The questioner asks: Do we argue with scholarly disagreement in the presence of an explicit text?
Answer:
This is misguidance. The explicit text takes precedence over the opinion of so-and-so, and knowing this is misguidance. If you know the explicit text, you hold fast to it, even if the one who said it contradicts it.
The presenter:
May Allah reward you.
Source
قناة «العلامة الدكتور صالح الفوزان»، 23 من 24/تعليق على كتاب تفسير آيات من القرآن الكريم/حيران/صالح الفوزان/التفسير/كبار العلماء — youtube.com (46:20)
The Arabic text is a machine transcription of the audio recording.