Text copied Link copied

Al-Fatawa – home

﴿ فَاسْأَلُوا أَهْلَ الذِّكْرِ إِن كُنتُمْ لَا تَعْلَمُونَ ﴾

Scholar
Search mode

The Layman's Position on Scholarly Disagreement Regarding Declaring a Man an Innovator

Machine translationRead the Arabic original
Question:
This questioner says: If the scholars, or some of the scholars, disagree on declaring one man an innovator, with one saying he is an innovator and the other saying he is from the people of the Sunnah, what should the layman do? And is it correct for him to apply the principle of criticizing and vindicating narrators?

Answer:
My brothers, al-jarh wa al-ta'dil (the critique and vindication of narrators) is for the hadith scholars; it is not for you to speak about people, saying so-and-so is good and so-and-so is not good. That is talebearing and backbiting, not al-jarh wa al-ta'dil. Al-jarh wa al-ta'dil is a science of hadith, concerning the chains of narration and the narrators, and it is for the hadith scholars, not for the general public.
And the criterion for declaring someone an innovator is that he acts upon a bid'ah (religious innovation) or introduces a bid'ah. Whoever introduces it or acts upon it, even if he did not introduce it, is an innovator.
'A'isha reported Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) as saying: He who innovates things in our affairs for which there is no valid (reason) (commits sin) and these are to be rejected.من أحدث بأمرنا هذا ما ليس منه فهو رد
Sahih Muslim 1718a
, and in a narration: whoever does a deed for which there is no basis, even if he did not introduce it, he is [an innovator].
He who did any act for which there is no sanction from our behalf, that is to be rejected.من عمل عملا ليس عليه أمرنا فهو رد
Sahih Muslim 1718b


The presenter:
May Allah reward you.
Source تفسير آيات من القرآن الكريم 12-07-1435هـ — af.org.sa (1:05:20)

The Arabic text is a machine transcription of the audio recording.

Flag this fatwa