The ruling on one who accuses religious methodologies of being the cause of affliction
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
Question:
He asks: Is the one who dares to accuse religious methodologies of being the cause of affliction, takfir (declaring someone a disbeliever), and bombings, and so on, a disbeliever?
Answer:
If he knows what is in them and that they are the truth, and he believes that this is the cause of the bombings and the cause of corruption, then he is falling short in that. But if he is ignorant, and people suggest to him that they say such and such, and he follows them while being ignorant of what is in the methodologies, then he is excused until it is made clear to him what is in the methodologies and that they are methodologies of truth, and that there is no extremism in them and no radicalism. This is made clear to him. Yes, yes.
He asks: Is the one who dares to accuse religious methodologies of being the cause of affliction, takfir (declaring someone a disbeliever), and bombings, and so on, a disbeliever?
Answer:
If he knows what is in them and that they are the truth, and he believes that this is the cause of the bombings and the cause of corruption, then he is falling short in that. But if he is ignorant, and people suggest to him that they say such and such, and he follows them while being ignorant of what is in the methodologies, then he is excused until it is made clear to him what is in the methodologies and that they are methodologies of truth, and that there is no extremism in them and no radicalism. This is made clear to him. Yes, yes.
Source
من يتهم المناهج الدينية بالغلو — alfawzan.live
The Arabic text is a machine transcription of the audio recording.