The ruling on using the rebellion of Ibn al-Zubayr and al-Husayn as evidence for rebelling against the ruler

Question:
He says: There is no evidence for the permissibility of rebelling against the ruler based on the rebellion of 'Abdullah ibn Abi Bar against al-Hajjaj, and the rebellion of al-Husayn against Yazid. What is the validity of this evidence?

Answer:
'Abdullah ibn al-Zubayr did not rebel against a ruler in authority, because after the death of Yazid, the matter was in a state of uncertainty. So 'Abdullah ibn al-Zubayr rebelled during this period when the Muslims did not have a general imam. He is a noble Companion and a scholar of independent legal reasoning (may Allah be pleased with him), but he did not rebel against a general imam for the Muslims. What is the second thing? The rebellion of whom? Al-Kasir. Al-Husayn (may Allah be pleased with him). Al-Husayn (may Allah be pleased with him) was deceived; the Shi'ah deceived him and asked him to sign [the letter of allegiance], so when he fell into the trap, they abandoned him and he was killed (may Allah be pleased with him). So he was deceived by them. Yes.