The fidyah for leaving the state of ihram without entering it at the miqat
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
Question:
The questioner says: A woman passed the miqat without entering the state of ihram, out of fear of remaining in ihram for a long period, because she entered Makkah thirty days ago, and then she entered ihram on the sixth day. What is required of her?
Answer:
She owes a fidyah because she left the state of ihram without entering it at the miqat. This is leaving one of the obligatory acts of Hajj, so she owes a fidyah. What she should have done was go out to the miqat and enter ihram from there, or return to it and enter ihram from there. However, since she entered ihram from Makkah, she owes a fidyah. Yes.
The questioner says: A woman passed the miqat without entering the state of ihram, out of fear of remaining in ihram for a long period, because she entered Makkah thirty days ago, and then she entered ihram on the sixth day. What is required of her?
Answer:
She owes a fidyah because she left the state of ihram without entering it at the miqat. This is leaving one of the obligatory acts of Hajj, so she owes a fidyah. What she should have done was go out to the miqat and enter ihram from there, or return to it and enter ihram from there. However, since she entered ihram from Makkah, she owes a fidyah. Yes.
Source
فتاوى الحاج في يوم التروية — alfawzan.live (15:12)
The Arabic text is a machine transcription of the audio recording.