The Ruling on Citing Weak Hadiths in the Book of Tawhid

Question:
May Allah reward you, Honorable Shaykh. This questioner says: Some of the students memorize the book of Tawhid (the oneness of Allah) for us. As for the weak hadiths and athar (reports from the Companions or successors), do they accept them based on their memorization? For example, what is mentioned in the chapter on "When it covers her, praise the sky of the tribe," which contains the athar from Ibn 'Abbas (may Allah be pleased with him and his father). It is one of the wonders that it has reached this state now in the book of Tawhid, and the evidence contained therein.

Answer:
Meaning, the Shaykh became ignorant and incited the Muslims, so it is not acceptable to think that the Shaykh was ignorant and that he placed weak hadiths in this context that cannot be used as evidence, or that he was ignorant of the Muslims' knowledge that they are weak and fabricated in this book? Also, this context was scrutinized by the scholars and the people of hadith, and they did not criticize it in any way, until the dregs of this era appeared, claiming that they know hadith, and they began to criticize this book or other books of the scholars. Yes.