The Ruling on Accusing a Disbeliever of Zina and the Difference Between That and the Ruling on a Muharib
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The questioner:
The Shaykh, may Allah grant you success, if a disbeliever is accused of zina, is the one who made the accusation to be isolated?
The Shaykh:
Yes, he is excused once, just once, because it is not befitting for a Muslim to utter such words; he should purify his tongue from such speech. Also, the disbeliever, if he is a musta'min (a non-Muslim granted safe conduct) or has a treaty, has inviolability; he has inviolability, and one does not transgress against him. Yes.
The questioner:
So, is there a distinction between the migrants and others in war?
The Shaykh:
In war, he has no inviolability. The discussion is about the aggressor. Yes.
The Shaykh, may Allah grant you success, if a disbeliever is accused of zina, is the one who made the accusation to be isolated?
The Shaykh:
Yes, he is excused once, just once, because it is not befitting for a Muslim to utter such words; he should purify his tongue from such speech. Also, the disbeliever, if he is a musta'min (a non-Muslim granted safe conduct) or has a treaty, has inviolability; he has inviolability, and one does not transgress against him. Yes.
The questioner:
So, is there a distinction between the migrants and others in war?
The Shaykh:
In war, he has no inviolability. The discussion is about the aggressor. Yes.
Source
من يرمي الكافر بالزنا — alfawzan.live
The Arabic text is a machine transcription of the audio recording.