Text copied Link copied

Al-Fatawa – home

﴿ فَاسْأَلُوا أَهْلَ الذِّكْرِ إِن كُنتُمْ لَا تَعْلَمُونَ ﴾

Scholar
Search mode

The ruling on the statement of one who knew the Prophet but was not commanded to convey his message

Machine translationRead the Arabic original
Question:
May Allah reward you, Honorable Shaykh. This questioner says: Some scholars have rejected the statement of one who knew the Prophet, that he is one to whom a law was revealed, but he was not commanded to convey it. He mentioned this regarding Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah in his well-known book, *Kitab al-Nubuwwat* (The Book of Prophethood). What is the accurate position? He says: Some scholars have rejected the statement of one who knew the Prophet, that he is one to whom a law was revealed, but he was not commanded to convey it, and he mentioned this in

Answer:
This is correct, and the one who rejects this is ignorant. Shaykh al-Islam did not reject this in *Kitab al-Nubuwwat*; rather, he mentioned it. He mentioned this in *Kitab al-Nubuwwat*, stating the difference between the *nabi* (prophet) and the *rasul* (messenger). But this indicates that the questioner has not read *Kitab al-Nubuwwat*. Yes.
Source المراد بالنبي — alfawzan.live

The Arabic text is a machine transcription of the audio recording.

Flag this fatwa