The Ruling on the Blood of the Treaty-Bound and the One Granted Safe Conduct
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
Question:
Honorable Shaykh, the scholars mention in books of Islamic jurisprudence and elsewhere the concept of the inviolable (ma'sum). So the question is: is it not the case that in the general sense, the inviolable is the believer, and no one else is included, such as the treaty-bound (mu'ahad) and the one granted safe conduct (musta'min)? Yes.
Answer:
He has the protection of Allah and the protection of His Messenger, yet he has not smelled the fragrance of Paradise. So the treaty-bound is inviolable in his blood by virtue of the treaty and the pledge he took from the Muslims.
Honorable Shaykh, the scholars mention in books of Islamic jurisprudence and elsewhere the concept of the inviolable (ma'sum). So the question is: is it not the case that in the general sense, the inviolable is the believer, and no one else is included, such as the treaty-bound (mu'ahad) and the one granted safe conduct (musta'min)? Yes.
Answer:
He has the protection of Allah and the protection of His Messenger, yet he has not smelled the fragrance of Paradise. So the treaty-bound is inviolable in his blood by virtue of the treaty and the pledge he took from the Muslims.
Source
المراد بالمعصوم — alfawzan.live
The Arabic text is a machine transcription of the audio recording.