The validity of the claim that the disagreement with the Murji'ah jurists is verbal
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
Question:
What is the validity of the claim that the disagreement with the Murji'ah jurists is a verbal disagreement?
Answer:
And what is the validity of attributing that to Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah in his book on Faith? This statement is incorrect. The disagreement between the people of the Sunnah and the Murji'ah is a substantive disagreement, a real disagreement, not a verbal one. Only those who want to downplay the matter and calm things down say this. Yes, indeed. But those who want to clarify the truth do not say this, and Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah did not say this. Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah did not say this. Yes.
The presenter:
May Allah reward you
What is the validity of the claim that the disagreement with the Murji'ah jurists is a verbal disagreement?
Answer:
And what is the validity of attributing that to Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah in his book on Faith? This statement is incorrect. The disagreement between the people of the Sunnah and the Murji'ah is a substantive disagreement, a real disagreement, not a verbal one. Only those who want to downplay the matter and calm things down say this. Yes, indeed. But those who want to clarify the truth do not say this, and Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah did not say this. Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah did not say this. Yes.
The presenter:
May Allah reward you
Source
شرح نونية ابن القيم [41] — alfawzan.live (1:02:51)
The Arabic text is a machine transcription of the audio recording.