Text copied Link copied

Al-Fatawa – home

﴿ فَاسْأَلُوا أَهْلَ الذِّكْرِ إِن كُنتُمْ لَا تَعْلَمُونَ ﴾

Scholar
Search mode

The ruling on one who circumambulated the Ka'bah while in a state of ihram without knowing, and passed the miqat

Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The Shaykh:
How? How? Welcome.

The questioner:
A man circumambulated the Ka'bah while in a state of ihram without knowing.

The Shaykh:
He passed. He passed. He passed the points.

The questioner:
Good morning.

The Shaykh:
Did he pass the miqat without entering the state of ihram?

The questioner:
A question.

The Shaykh:
It does not come to mind.

The questioner:
Yes.

The Shaykh:
Where did he enter the state of ihram from?

The questioner:
From Makkah, and from where the dowry came to us.

The Shaykh:
The miqat. He returned to the miqat.

The questioner:
Yes, we press on the board.

The Shaykh:
From the miqat? He owes nothing as long as he returned; he owes nothing.

The questioner:
And he came.

The Shaykh:
He returned before entering ihram.

The questioner:
He returned to the state of ihram.

The Shaykh:
From the miqat? No problem. Yes. And if they did not return, if he entered the state of ihram from inside, he owes a sacrificial animal, having left the miqat, but the one who returned to the miqat owes nothing.

The questioner:
It is not dropped, it is not dropped.

The Shaykh:
He has no sin on him, but if he returned, he owes nothing. Yes.

The questioner:
The direction.

The Shaykh:
If he returned to the miqat and entered the state of ihram, he is required to do nothing; he owes nothing.
Source صحيح البخاري (الشرح الثاني) — binbaz.org.sa (14:42)

The Arabic text is a machine transcription of the audio recording.

Flag this fatwa