The ruling on entering the state of ihram from other than the miqat for one who changes his route
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
Question:
The questioner says: A man intended to perform Hajj from Tabuk, but he was compelled to go to the south to deliver his children there. So he traveled to the south, came from there, and entered the state of ihram for Hajj from Wadi al-Mahram, even though he had intended to perform Hajj from Tabuk. Does he owe anything if he enters the state of ihram from other than his miqat?
Answer:
If he comes from the route of Ta'if, he enters the state of ihram from Bab al-Ard, and if he comes from the route of Yemen, he enters the state of ihram from Yalamlam. There is no blame on him, even if he is in Tabuk. [UNTRANSLATED: hun la hun] and for those who come to them other than their people.
The questioner says: A man intended to perform Hajj from Tabuk, but he was compelled to go to the south to deliver his children there. So he traveled to the south, came from there, and entered the state of ihram for Hajj from Wadi al-Mahram, even though he had intended to perform Hajj from Tabuk. Does he owe anything if he enters the state of ihram from other than his miqat?
Answer:
If he comes from the route of Ta'if, he enters the state of ihram from Bab al-Ard, and if he comes from the route of Yemen, he enters the state of ihram from Yalamlam. There is no blame on him, even if he is in Tabuk. [UNTRANSLATED: hun la hun] and for those who come to them other than their people.
Source
فتاوى الحج ١٤١٠ هـ - ١٥ — archive.org (16:38)
The Arabic text is a machine transcription of the audio recording.