The ruling on seclusion in homes when trials are widespread
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
Question:
He says: When trials become widespread, is a person required to stay in his home with his family?
Answer:
There is a distinction here. A person who is of benefit, if he goes out of his home, there is benefit in clarifying the truth, refuting falsehood, supporting the truth, and teaching the people; such a person does not seclude himself in his home, he goes out. As for a person who is unable and has no knowledge, it is safer for him to stay in his home.
He says: When trials become widespread, is a person required to stay in his home with his family?
Answer:
There is a distinction here. A person who is of benefit, if he goes out of his home, there is benefit in clarifying the truth, refuting falsehood, supporting the truth, and teaching the people; such a person does not seclude himself in his home, he goes out. As for a person who is unable and has no knowledge, it is safer for him to stay in his home.
Source
الفوزان - لقاء مفتوح - الجديد في الإرهاب — archive.org (32:32)
The Arabic text is a machine transcription of the audio recording.