The ruling on the pilgrim who passes his miqat without entering ihram, then enters ihram from another miqat
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
Question:
Honorable Shaykh, this questioner says: A pilgrim passed his miqat without entering ihram, then went and entered ihram from another miqat. What is the ruling on his situation?
Answer:
The ruling for him is a fidyah (ransom payment); the fidyah has become obligatory upon him. It was obligatory for him to go back and enter ihram from the miqat he had passed initially. However, since he did not go back and entered ihram from elsewhere, the fidyah became obligatory upon him because he committed a prohibited act, which is not entering ihram from the miqat. So he must offer a fidyah, which he slaughters in Makkah and distributes to the poor. Yes.
The presenter:
May Allah reward you
Honorable Shaykh, this questioner says: A pilgrim passed his miqat without entering ihram, then went and entered ihram from another miqat. What is the ruling on his situation?
Answer:
The ruling for him is a fidyah (ransom payment); the fidyah has become obligatory upon him. It was obligatory for him to go back and enter ihram from the miqat he had passed initially. However, since he did not go back and entered ihram from elsewhere, the fidyah became obligatory upon him because he committed a prohibited act, which is not entering ihram from the miqat. So he must offer a fidyah, which he slaughters in Makkah and distributes to the poor. Yes.
The presenter:
May Allah reward you
Source
75-اللقاء الأسبوعي مع الشيخ صالح الفوزان - 18 — archive.org (1:02:10)
The Arabic text is a machine transcription of the audio recording.