The ruling on dividing a country between two rulers
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The questioner : Is Ibn Hajar’s argument, based on this hadith, that it is permissible to divide a country between two rulers, correct?
The Shaykh : Who was killed?
The questioner : Dividing the country between two rulers; his argument using al-Hajar in this hadith that it is permissible to divide the country between two rulers.
The Shaykh : Meaning that there are two rulers. Yes, that is correct.
The questioner : Correct.
The Shaykh : And… on the basis of independence, it is not valid, but on the basis of following, there is no harm.
The questioner : If it is under our master, it is not as if it is a separate rule, but rather…
The Shaykh : No, not on the basis of interaction, for they have a ruler above them, and he said: “You are both rulers, but consult each other and agree, as the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) ordered Abu Musa al-Ash’ari and Mu’adh ibn Jabal.”
The Shaykh : Who was killed?
The questioner : Dividing the country between two rulers; his argument using al-Hajar in this hadith that it is permissible to divide the country between two rulers.
The Shaykh : Meaning that there are two rulers. Yes, that is correct.
The questioner : Correct.
The Shaykh : And… on the basis of independence, it is not valid, but on the basis of following, there is no harm.
The questioner : If it is under our master, it is not as if it is a separate rule, but rather…
The Shaykh : No, not on the basis of interaction, for they have a ruler above them, and he said: “You are both rulers, but consult each other and agree, as the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) ordered Abu Musa al-Ash’ari and Mu’adh ibn Jabal.”
Source
قناة «فضيلة الشيخ محمد بن صالح العثيمين»، 3571 - 4600 هل يصح استدلال ابن حجر على جواز تقسيم البلد بين أميرين؟ ابن عثيمين — youtube.com (0:07)
The Arabic text is a machine transcription of the audio recording.
