Guaranteeing the sacrificial animal if it is damaged by someone’s transgression
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The questioner:
If he were well-off, he would not be required to replace it. What is the matter with you?
The Shaykh:
Hmm?
The questioner:
I say if he were well-off and it was damaged.
The Shaykh:
He is not required to pay for the house, except if the one who damaged it is its owner, then he is required to pay; the one who transgressed against it is required to pay.
If he were well-off, he would not be required to replace it. What is the matter with you?
The Shaykh:
Hmm?
The questioner:
I say if he were well-off and it was damaged.
The Shaykh:
He is not required to pay for the house, except if the one who damaged it is its owner, then he is required to pay; the one who transgressed against it is required to pay.
Source
شرح كتاب المنتقى من أخبار المصطفى صلى الله عليه وسلم [ الشرح الأول ]، بداية من باب تحلل المحصر عن العمرة بالنحر ثم الحلق حيث أحصر من حل أو حرم — islamhouse.com (32:31)
The Arabic text is a machine transcription of the audio recording.