The ruling on the interruption of Tamattu' by returning to one's family

Question:
A man who performed Tamattu' entered the state of Ihram for 'Umrah, then exited the state of Ihram, and then returned to his family in Jeddah and entered the state of Ihram for Hajj from there. Does the Tamattu' become interrupted? What is the ruling? A man performing Tamattu' who is from the people of Jeddah. He entered the state of Ihram for 'Umrah, and when he finished his 'Umrah, he returned to Jeddah.

Answer:
It is based on the opinion of the majority or otherwise, because he returned to his family, just as 'Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) issued a fatwa. Even if he was from the people of the Salaf. He returned to his family, yes. Or from Sharai'ah, for example. But if he pays the fidyah (ransom payment) as a precaution, that is good, and what is known among the scholars is that there is no obligation on him if he returns to his family and then returns for Hajj. He does it with a kaffarah (expiation). There is no harm in it. You do not perform the sa'y (walking between al-Safa and al-Marwah) except for the sitting of the pilgrims, just as you delayed 'A'ishah. The interruption of the one performing Tamattu' is by his returning to his family or by his exiting the Haram (sacred precinct), so if he goes to Madinah or... by returning to his family for the Zuhr (midday prayer).