The Ruling on Consecutiveness in Ablution, and Ignorance and Forgetfulness
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
Question:
In the hadith of the drop, a man was reading in the making up of the midday prayer, but he did not get the water right. What do we have in it? What did he benefit from it? Hmm?
Answer:
The obligation of consecutiveness, meaning how many issues did we take? Four. The fifth: I add the fifth that ignorance and forgetfulness do not drop the obligation. This is a man who was ignorant, and the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) did not excuse him for his ignorance; rather, he ordered him to repeat it. This indicates that ignorance and forgetfulness do not drop the obligation. If one forgets the prayer, it is not dropped from him; if one forgets the ablution, the ablution is not dropped from him. And so on. So ignorance and forgetfulness are not an excuse from the obligatory command. Yes.
In the hadith of the drop, a man was reading in the making up of the midday prayer, but he did not get the water right. What do we have in it? What did he benefit from it? Hmm?
Answer:
The obligation of consecutiveness, meaning how many issues did we take? Four. The fifth: I add the fifth that ignorance and forgetfulness do not drop the obligation. This is a man who was ignorant, and the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) did not excuse him for his ignorance; rather, he ordered him to repeat it. This indicates that ignorance and forgetfulness do not drop the obligation. If one forgets the prayer, it is not dropped from him; if one forgets the ablution, the ablution is not dropped from him. And so on. So ignorance and forgetfulness are not an excuse from the obligatory command. Yes.
Source
شرح بلوغ المرام من أدلة الأحكام [ صالح الفوزان ]، تابع باب الوضوء - 6 — islamhouse.com (12:44)
The Arabic text is a machine transcription of the audio recording.