The ruling on one who passes the miqat without entering ihram, then enters ihram from Makkah
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
Question:
A questioner asked about a man who passed the miqat without entering ihram, though he had the intention to perform Hajj. He reached Makkah, and when he went to the last meeting in Makkah and did not go back to the miqat he had passed earlier, the Shaykh forbade him from doing so.
Answer:
Yes, he owes a fidyah (ransom payment). Either he must return to the miqat he passed and enter ihram from there, or if he enters ihram from somewhere else, he owes a fidyah, because he left an obligatory act. Yes, and it is not sufficient for him to go to al-Hal or at-Tan'īm; this is not enough.
A questioner asked about a man who passed the miqat without entering ihram, though he had the intention to perform Hajj. He reached Makkah, and when he went to the last meeting in Makkah and did not go back to the miqat he had passed earlier, the Shaykh forbade him from doing so.
Answer:
Yes, he owes a fidyah (ransom payment). Either he must return to the miqat he passed and enter ihram from there, or if he enters ihram from somewhere else, he owes a fidyah, because he left an obligatory act. Yes, and it is not sufficient for him to go to al-Hal or at-Tan'īm; this is not enough.
Source
شرح بلوغ المرام من أدلة الأحكام [ صالح الفوزان ]، باب فضله وبيان من فرض عليه — islamhouse.com (57:25)
The Arabic text is a machine transcription of the audio recording.