Reconciliation between the two parties if its absence is less problematic
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The questioner:
Honorable Shaykh, if it is better for the two parties to remain without reconciliation because it reduces the problems between them, should they be left in this state?
The Shaykh:
If he is.
The questioner:
If it is better for the two parties to remain without reconciliation because it reduces the problems between them, should they be left in this state, or is reconciliation necessary?
The Shaykh:
That is the opposite. Reconciliation is what reduces disputes and buries grudges, whereas disputes stir up grudges. But reconciliation is the opposite; it is what reduces disputes and brings out the grudges in people’s hearts. Yes.
Honorable Shaykh, if it is better for the two parties to remain without reconciliation because it reduces the problems between them, should they be left in this state?
The Shaykh:
If he is.
The questioner:
If it is better for the two parties to remain without reconciliation because it reduces the problems between them, should they be left in this state, or is reconciliation necessary?
The Shaykh:
That is the opposite. Reconciliation is what reduces disputes and buries grudges, whereas disputes stir up grudges. But reconciliation is the opposite; it is what reduces disputes and brings out the grudges in people’s hearts. Yes.
Source
شرح بلوغ المرام من أدلة الأحكام [ صالح الفوزان ]، بداية من باب الصلح — islamhouse.com (1:15:37)
The Arabic text is a machine transcription of the audio recording.