Is there a doctrinal objection in the poet’s saying: [[Everything is destined to perish *** Except my Lord and righteous deeds]]
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
Question:
May Allah reward you, Your Eminence, father. The questioner asks about the poet’s saying, “Everything is destined to perish, except my Lord and righteous deeds.” Is there a doctrinal objection in it?
Answer:
There is no doctrinal objection. I say there is no doctrinal objection. Righteous deeds remain for their owners, and evil deeds also remain for their owners. So if he had said “and deeds,” or if he had specified “righteous deeds” and said “and deeds,” yes, this remains for them.
May Allah reward you, Your Eminence, father. The questioner asks about the poet’s saying, “Everything is destined to perish, except my Lord and righteous deeds.” Is there a doctrinal objection in it?
Answer:
There is no doctrinal objection. I say there is no doctrinal objection. Righteous deeds remain for their owners, and evil deeds also remain for their owners. So if he had said “and deeds,” or if he had specified “righteous deeds” and said “and deeds,” yes, this remains for them.
Source
قناة «العلامة الدكتور صالح الفوزان»، [804- 4717] هل يوجد محذور عقدي في قول الشاعر: [[كل شيء مصيره الزوال *** غير ربي وصالح الأعمال]] — youtube.com
The Arabic text is a machine transcription of the audio recording.
