What is the validity of the statement: It is permissible to take back a gift; because the dog is not forbidden to return to its vomit?
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
Question:
He says: Honorable Shaykh, may Allah grant you success, some of the mujtahid scholars say that it is permissible to take back a gift; because the dog is not forbidden to return to its vomit. I mean, like a dog, O Shaykh?
Answer:
This is inverted jurisprudence. The Messenger (peace and blessings be upon him) intended to disparage this; do not be like a dog. If the one who is known for being like a dog is the one who says this, then he is not a jurist.
He says: Honorable Shaykh, may Allah grant you success, some of the mujtahid scholars say that it is permissible to take back a gift; because the dog is not forbidden to return to its vomit. I mean, like a dog, O Shaykh?
Answer:
This is inverted jurisprudence. The Messenger (peace and blessings be upon him) intended to disparage this; do not be like a dog. If the one who is known for being like a dog is the one who says this, then he is not a jurist.
Source
قناة «العلامة الدكتور صالح الفوزان»، [1586 -2802] ما صحة القول: يُباح الرجوع في الهبة؛ لأن الكلب ليس مُحرمًا عليه أن يرجع في قيئه؟ — youtube.com
The Arabic text is a machine transcription of the audio recording.