Text copied Link copied

Al-Fatawa – home

﴿ فَاسْأَلُوا أَهْلَ الذِّكْرِ إِن كُنتُمْ لَا تَعْلَمُونَ ﴾

Scholar
Search mode

The author of the text says: Guaranteeing liability is permissible in cases of transgression regarding trusts, and the commentator says: Guaranteeing liability is not permissible; so which of the two is more correct?

Machine translationRead the Arabic original
Question:
The Honorable Shaykh, may Allah grant you success, says: The author of the text states that guaranteeing liability is permissible in cases of transgression regarding trusts, and the commentator, who is Ibn Badran (may Allah have mercy on him), says that guaranteeing liability for transgression regarding trusts is not valid. So what is the correct statement in this matter? He says it is not valid, what? Guaranteeing liability for transgression regarding trusts. And what does the text say? It says it is valid that guaranteeing liability is permissible in cases of transgression regarding trusts. In cases of transgression regarding trusts, yes.

Answer:
Yes, and Ibn Badran says that guaranteeing liability for transgression regarding trusts is not valid.
Source قناة «العلامة الدكتور صالح الفوزان»، [1300 -2802] قال الماتن: الضمان جائز في التعدي في الأمانات،وقال المحشي: الضمان غير جائز؛ فأيهما أصح؟ — youtube.com

The Arabic text is a machine transcription of the audio recording.

Flag this fatwa