Is the one against whom the evidence has been established from the Jahmiyyah, the Mu'tazilah, or the Sufis, and who did not accept it, declared a disbeliever specifically?
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
Question:
May Allah reward you, Honorable Shaykh. This questioner says: Is the one against whom the evidence has been established from the Jahmiyyah, the Mu'tazilah, or the Sufis, and who did not accept it, declared a disbeliever specifically?
Answer:
Without a doubt, if the evidence is established against him and he rejects it, there is no doubt in his disbelief because his excuse is removed, for his excuse is removed after the explanation. Yes, this is what the scholars have agreed upon: if it is explained to him and he rejects it after the explanation, he is ruled to be a disbeliever because he has no excuse after that. Yes.
May Allah reward you, Honorable Shaykh. This questioner says: Is the one against whom the evidence has been established from the Jahmiyyah, the Mu'tazilah, or the Sufis, and who did not accept it, declared a disbeliever specifically?
Answer:
Without a doubt, if the evidence is established against him and he rejects it, there is no doubt in his disbelief because his excuse is removed, for his excuse is removed after the explanation. Yes, this is what the scholars have agreed upon: if it is explained to him and he rejects it after the explanation, he is ruled to be a disbeliever because he has no excuse after that. Yes.
Source
قناة «العلامة الدكتور صالح الفوزان»، [249 -858] هل من أقيمت عليه الحجة من الجهمية أو المعتزلة أو الصوفية ولم يقبلها، هل يكفر بعينه؟ — youtube.com
The Arabic text is a machine transcription of the audio recording.
