The Ruling on Treating a Patient with Blood and Clarifying the Hadith of Ibn 'Umar Regarding Fish
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The questioner:
Returning to the matter of treating a patient with blood, this falls under the category of dire necessity, to the extent that it is permissible to eat carrion
The Shaykh:
in a state of dire necessity. However, it is not prescribed.
The questioner:
And Allah knows that the Hanafis cited evidence against the hadith just mentioned, which is also a weak hadith.
The Shaykh:
Yes, but the two hadiths are different. The hadith of Ibn 'Umar is stronger, but it has no corroborating narrations to support it, because the verses and hadiths that permitted fish and flowing water support the hadith of Ibn 'Umar, whereas nothing supports the hadith of the Qadi; rather, the evidence is against it.
Returning to the matter of treating a patient with blood, this falls under the category of dire necessity, to the extent that it is permissible to eat carrion
The Shaykh:
in a state of dire necessity. However, it is not prescribed.
The questioner:
And Allah knows that the Hanafis cited evidence against the hadith just mentioned, which is also a weak hadith.
The Shaykh:
Yes, but the two hadiths are different. The hadith of Ibn 'Umar is stronger, but it has no corroborating narrations to support it, because the verses and hadiths that permitted fish and flowing water support the hadith of Ibn 'Umar, whereas nothing supports the hadith of the Qadi; rather, the evidence is against it.
Source
قناة «العلامة الدكتور صالح الفوزان»، 4 من 175 /شرح بلوغ المرام/الطهارة/المياه/صالح الفوزان/الحديث/كبار العلماء — youtube.com (33:00)
The Arabic text is a machine transcription of the audio recording.