A woman saying to her husband: “You are forbidden to me,” and then he has intercourse with her
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
Question:
Your Eminence, father. The questioner says: A woman became angry with her husband, then she said, “You are forbidden to me,” intending by that to prevent him from having intercourse with her. Then her husband had intercourse with her. Is anything required of either spouse, or not?
Answer:
She owes the expiation for an oath. As for the husband, nothing is required of him because he did not take an oath. So she owes the expiation for an oath. Yes.
The presenter:
May Allah reward you
Your Eminence, father. The questioner says: A woman became angry with her husband, then she said, “You are forbidden to me,” intending by that to prevent him from having intercourse with her. Then her husband had intercourse with her. Is anything required of either spouse, or not?
Answer:
She owes the expiation for an oath. As for the husband, nothing is required of him because he did not take an oath. So she owes the expiation for an oath. Yes.
The presenter:
May Allah reward you
Source
قناة «العلامة الدكتور صالح الفوزان»، 089 من 123 / شرح كتاب زاد المستقنع / الظهار / صالح الفوزان / الفقه / كبار العلماء — youtube.com (37:02)
The Arabic text is a machine transcription of the audio recording.