The ruling on the partnership of one who did not bring capital in the wealth of his brothers

The questioner : From some of the brothers, each relying on the other brothers, each relying on the other brothers, who does not bring anything. One of them trades and brings in wealth and trades, and so on, and one of them does not bring anything, has no work, and no trade. So they marry him off, build for him, and he sits. If someone like this dies

The Shaykh : No, this is wealth that is not his, except for what they gave him, and he is not a partner. He has nothing except what they gave him. The building they built is his, and he has it to himself. As for being a partner in the rest of the wealth, when he did not bring wealth, did not work, and they did not make him a partner—if they had made him a partner, saying, "We have no wealth, be a partner with us in the gain and the loss, even if you have no wealth and do no work, it does not matter to you,"

The questioner : This is a Shaykh, may Allah reward you. The custom is that they give him everything he needs. This is the established custom.

The Shaykh : If these are people who spend on them, and their wealth is specific to them, and his is specific to his wealth, is that so? And the second question.

The questioner : The question: What do the orphans have? The orphans

The Shaykh : From their uncles, from the wealth of their uncles? No, they have nothing except what their uncles gave to their father.