The ruling on the moisture from a woman’s private parts

Question : What is in the question is only after the questions have been exhausted,

Answer : Well then, there is scholarly disagreement regarding the moisture from a woman’s private parts. Those who said it is ritually impure (najasah) said that it comes out of the passage, so it is ritually impure like everything else that comes out of the passage. Those who said it is ritually pure said that not everything that comes out of the two passages is ritually impure, as proven by semen, which comes out of the two passages and is not ritually impure. As for this moisture, if it comes out of the urinary tract, we agree with you that it is ritually impure, because it appears that it came out of the bladder. If it comes out from below the male organ’s passage, then it is ritually pure, because it is not urine, and the default is the absence of ritual impurity until evidence establishes its impurity. In fact, we have positive evidence in this issue: when a man has intercourse with his wife, he is not required to wash his penis, even if it were ritually impure, he would be required to wash his penis. And if it were ritually impure, then if clothes were soiled by it, they would have to be washed. In fact, the semen that comes out of a person would mix with this impure substance and become ritually impure.